U4GM: FC 26 Ratings from Casual to Competitive Play

Comentarios · 8 Puntos de vista

FC 26 sparks casual vs. competitive debate—relaxed players find fun despite flaws, while grinders face FOMO and "war-like" intensity; unpack how playstyles and reward systems define enjoyment in this divided football title.

FC 26 splits opinions sharply, with many in the community looking to buy FC 26 coins to level squads against persistent flaws. Voices like YMC slam it as pace-heavy with slow dribbles and poor AI for your side only. Tweaks bump bearability to 5/10, but "FC 25 disguise" claims slash it back.

Contrasts emerge: Ardaroo praises over FC 25 disaster in dribbling, shooting, glitch fixes—though passing ties draw fire as underrated strength. AI and delay issues acknowledged across board, earning "sometimes excellent" tag at 5/10. Revival ideas: restore keeper moves, fix pass needs, boost manual press.

Frostbite's shooter roots clash with soccer, stacking problems yearly versus Ignite's glory days. Casuals enjoy fun play, while Champs feels like "war" with Pina screws and FOMO grind. Replay absences and casual catering irk pros.

Hold EA accountable: enjoyable casually, but needs fixes for longevity. Community brainpower demands better.

Read more: Best FC 26 Formation Right Now: 4411 vs 451 – Which One Truly Dominates?

Comentarios